Bear Stearns Will Pay $28 Million


Bear Stearns and subsidiary EMC Mortgage on Tuesday agreed to pay $28 million in settlement with the Federal Trade Commission, on charges of defrauding tens of thousands of home loan customers and violating four sets of federal laws.

"The companies violated four different federal laws, "said Frank Dorman, the spokesperson for the FTC. "We hope people in mortgage servicing companies will read this judgment and adhere to the law."

Bear Sterns through its mortgage subsidiary, EMC, has handled 475,000 mortgage loans in the last year.

Apart from misrepresenting the amounts borrowers owed, said the FTC's complaint, the company charged unauthorized fees to clients. One such fee was the $500 loan-modification fee, which was automatically added to the loan's principle balance, without notice to the client.

The company also made harassing collection calls, where agents would wrongly state the legal status or amount of the customers' debts.

The defendants also failed to notify customers of their right to obtain verification of the debt, or of their right to dispute the debt. When the loans were contested, the defendants failed to report the dispute to credit reporting agencies, as required by law.

Bear Sterns and EMC did, however, illegally share information about the customers' payment status with credit reporting agencies.

In total, the FTC Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and regulation Z of the Truth in Lending Act were all violated.

Apart from the $28 million in redress to affected customers, the settlement prohibits the companies from violating these laws in the future, and requires that they establish and maintain a comprehensive data integrity program to ensure accuracy of their data regarding consumers' loans.

The companies must also hire a qualified and independent group to ensure compliance with the settlement.

Apart for redress to consumers, no fines were imposed.

Bear Steams and EMC Mortgage are represented by Kevin Arquit, from Simpson Thacher & Bartlett.

Related listings

  • Russian court challenges International Olympic Committee

    Russian court challenges International Olympic Committee

    Financial 11/27/2018

    Court ruled Wednesday that bobsledder Alexander Zubkov, who carried the Russian flag at the opening ceremony of the 2014 Sochi Games, should still be considered an Olympic champion despite having been stripped of his medals because of doping. A CAS r...

  • Ronaldo summoned to court, Mourinho accused of tax fraud

    Ronaldo summoned to court, Mourinho accused of tax fraud

    Financial 06/20/2017

    Cristiano Ronaldo has been summoned to appear before a Spanish judge, and Jose Mourinho could be next. Ronaldo and Mourinho are the latest members of the soccer elite to be accused of tax fraud in Spain. Lionel Messi and Javier Mascherano, among othe...

  • High court ruling may give voter rights groups a strong tool

    High court ruling may give voter rights groups a strong tool

    Financial 05/22/2017

    The Supreme Court's ruling that two North Carolina congressional districts relied too heavily on race should give voting-rights advocates a potent tool to fight other electoral maps drawn to give Republicans an advantage in the state. The justices ag...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

New York Adoption and Family Law Attorneys Our attorneys have represented adoptive parents, birth parents, and adoption agencies. >> read